GREEN HARBOR RIVER STUDY

MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS

2005

 

Laurie Bianchi, M.Ed

Whitman-Hanson Regional High

600 Franklin Street

Whitman, MA 02382

August 3, 2006

3rd draft

Laurie.Bianchi@whrsd.org

 

Table of Contents

Introduction

4

Purpose

4

Hypothesis

4

Methods and Materials

4

Site Map

5

Surface Water Level

5

Turbidity

6

Specific Gravity

7

Salinity

8

Temperature

8

pH

8

Dissolved Oxygen

8

Biological Sampling Methods

9

Results

10

Biological Survey

16

Discussion

21

Conclusion

25

Recommendations

26

Summary

Sources

27

24

Appendix I

Data Sheets:  General and Nekton

Appendix II

Fishes and Crabs - Nekton Protocol

Appendix III

Salinity protocol

Appendix IV

Rainfall Data (Marshfield)

Appendix V

Nekton Sampling spreadsheet

Appendix VI

Fish of the Estuary

Appendix VII

Appendix VIII

Appendix IX

 

Line transect map and plant survey spreadsheet

Summary of Massachusetts Water Quality Standards

Ecological Roles of Estuaries

 

   Maps and Figures                 

                  1    Drainage Basin

                  2    Site Map of the Green Harbor River

                  3    Water level marks

                  4    Turbidity tube

                  5          Photograph of YSI -85 in use  

                  6          Nekton Seining at Site SN2  August 26, 2005

                  7          Turbidity Measurements 2005 - Secchi disk

                   8          Turbidity Tube Measurements

         9          Surface Salinity 2005

        10        Surface Water Temperatures 2005

                  11        Dissolved Oxygen Content 2005

                  12        Comparison of Percent Saturation  Dissolved Oxygen 2005

                  13        pH 2005

         14       To be entered - photo of fish

         15        Sluice Boards

         16        2004 Turbidity Measurements                          

          17        High Turbidity after nine months of zero tidal induction

          18        2004 Salinity Profile

          19        Postcard of Everson’s Island circa 1920

 

         Tables

          1          Water Levels in the Green Harbor River

          2          Turbidity Table

          3          Physical Data

          4          Nekton Sampling Data

5                         Physical Data for Nekton Sampling

6                        Relative Abundance

7                       Bag Seine Catch per unit Effort (CPUE)

8                       Life Stages – Nekton Length

Appendices                                                                             

          I           Data Sheets arranged by date:  General and Nekton

II.      Fishes and Crabs - excerpt from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring  New England Salt Marshes

III.               Salinity – excerpt from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes

IV        Rainfall data 2005

V.       Nekton Sampling Spreadsheet and Physical Data

VI.              Fish of the Estuary

VII.            Line transect map

VIII.         Summary of Massachusetts Water Quality Standards

          IX.      Ecological Role of Estuaries

          

         

                 Introduction

        

This report is the third in a series on the Green Harbor River in Marshfield, Massachusetts.  Please refer to the 2003 and 2004 investigations for historical background and literature review.   The town of Marshfield, in conjunction with Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management (CZM), is conducting a feasibility study on salt marsh restoration in Green Harbor River.  (Figure 1)

After the last tide- gate experiment in August and September 2004, in which a tide- gate was chained open for two weeks, the river was closed off to all tide, and the sluice boards were lowered.  Only outflow occurred during the winter of 2004-2005.  The river was low and extremely turbid.  In early June 2005, the town of Marshfield partially opened one tide gate to allow limited tidal induction.  It remains open to this day. Over the summer, water quality improved considerably. 

Research was conducted in 2005 to determine the water quality of the river at four sites, two in the harbor and two in the river (Figure 2).  An attempt to quantify the biological data began.  The purpose of this report is to provide information that can be compared to previous and future data by state and local organizations, municipalities, and individuals, in an effort to bring the river in compliance with the Clean Water Act.

            Joining the study this year was the Center for Student Coastal Research in Cohasset.   Nekton sampling and water quality testing were done in the harbor and river by David Ames, a number of high school students, and the author.

            The hypothesis  was that the harbor would have better water quality and habitat than the river because of the tidal restriction at the dike.  Very limited tidal exchange has occurred in the river with the current type of tide-gate.  With less tidal influence in the river, the dissolved oxygen levels were expected to be lower than in the harbor.  Also, the turbidity would be worse in the river.  One would expect habitat degradation in the river from years of limited tidal induction, resulting in less diversity of species and smaller populations.     

 

Methods and Materials

      

    This investigation involved visits ranging from thirty minutes to five hours, approximately once per week, from June 30 to August 26, 2005 at sites along the Green Harbor and Green Harbor River (Figure 2).  The harbor is considered the reference site (control) and the river is the study site.  There were   preliminary visits on April 22 and June 10,  with Whitman-Hanson students on a Community Service Learning field trip.   Water quality was tested by taking hydrographic measurements such as temperature, specific gravity, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity.  Not all tests were done each day as time constraints were larger this year due to the quantification and expansion of data collection. Biological (nekton) sampling was done on July 29, August 15 and August 26 according to CZM protocol (Appendix II).  Transects were set in the salt marsh of Green Harbor, and wells were placed to measure porewater salinity.  (Appendix III)

The drainage area map (Figure 1) is from a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Report (1993).

Text Box: RN1

The site map was created by Tim Smith of Coastal Zone Management  (Figure 2).  A change was made to the furthest left site.  The final location was on the mainland directly across on the south side of the river.   

Text Box: SN2
 
Text Box: SN1

Figure 2   Site Map of Nekton Sampling Sites

 

 

 

 

Text Box: RN2
 

Text Box: RN1
 

 

 

 

 

Rainfall  data was provided from Kevin Silva at the Town of Marshfield Wastewater Treatment Facility, located on Joseph Driebeck Way abutting Green Harbor (Appendix IV).

      This investigation was completed during three-hour visits, once a week, from June 23 to August 26, 2004 at sites along the Green Harbor River (Figure 1).  One preliminary visit with students on a Community Service Learning field trip occurred on May 25. Three follow-up visits were September 6, October 9, and November 14. Water quality was tested on each visit. Hydrographic measurements consisted of temperature, specific gravity, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and general observations such as color and suspended solids. Plankton tows and bottom sampling were done most days. Biological surveying was accomplished on certain visits, usually when students and/or adults were available to assist with nets.

Surface Water Level 

There was a board attached to the cement of the dike walls on the river.  It was marked with elevations above and below mean sea level in feet (NAVD). The board was dislodged by an algal mat in June 2004.   Paint marks on the wing walls have since been used to monitor the level.  Photographs of the board and cement lines were used to locate the +2 feet mark.  A yardstick, cardboard, and spray paint were used to place marks every half-foot down to -3 feet.  Volunteers were trained to read the water levels.  A reading consisted of date, time, level, tidal action (if any), and any other observations deemed relevant.

Figure 3:  Water level in NAVD (mean ocean tide is 0)

June 10, 2005

Turbidity

A secchi disk was clipped onto a line with markings every quarter meter.   The disk was lowered over the side of the dike from road level until it disappeared from sight.  Then it was lifted slowly until just visible.  This process shows the depth to which light can penetrate and is an indicator of the turbidity of the water.  The secchi disk was used when the inflow or outflow of water was very slow, preferably around slack tide.  When the current was too fast, the disk was pulled laterally, not allowing an accurate reading.

A turbidity tube (GLOBE protocol transparency tube) was used to enhance the quality of turbidity data and to allow measurements even when the current was strong.  A clear 120 cm. plastic PVC tube was equipped with a small secchi disk at the bottom.  Water collected from a clean bucket or the water collection device was placed in a bucket.  With the person’s back to the sun and using a clean container, the water sample was slowly transferred into the turbidity tube, a small amount at a time, just until the secchi disk was not visible.  The collector waited for air bubbles to settle as each new amount of water was added. The tube was rotated slowly while viewing to make sure none of the pattern was visible.  The height of water in centimeters was recorded. 

 

 

Figure 4:  Turbidity Tube for measuring turbidity

 

Water Chemistry

Specific Gravity

          The collection bottle or water collection device was first rinsed with the river water. The water sample was collected.  A plastic 100 mL graduated cylinder was rinsed with a small amount of sample.  After being emptied, the cylinder was filled with 90 mL of the sample.  The hydrometer was gently placed in the graduated cylinder. Temperature was checked and recorded. The water was allowed to warm up to 70°F if below that temperature, and the reading was taken from the bottom of the meniscus.  The hydrometer was manufactured by Marine Enterprises International, Inc. in Baltimore, MD.

Salinity

The salinity was determined by using the specific gravity data and a conversion chart.  A Sea Test Full Range Specific Gravity Meter manufactured by Aquarium Systems was used to verify the data. The procedure consisted of three steps: (1) Pour the sample to horizontal line, (2) tap the sides to release any air bubbles, and (3) read the salinity in parts per thousand from the pointer.  A YSI – 85 probe was used when available.  A refractometer was also used several times for equipment comparisons.

Temperature

Two methods were used for taking the temperature, depending upon the circumstances.  For grab samples the method was to collect the sample in the water collection device, transfer the sample to a white bucket, and insert an alcohol thermometer into the bucket for one minute.   A YSI – 85 probe was used when available.

pH

        The testing container was rinsed with sample water and emptied. The container was filled with sample water up to the line.  Four drops of indicator were added for the Freshwater High Range pH Test Kit, three drops for the Freshwater pH Test Kit.  The cap was replaced and tipped gently several times to mix.  Color was compared to the color chart.  The test kit for salt -water and/or fresh water aquaria was chosen depending upon results of the specific gravity test.  Ranges were 7.2-8.8 for High Range and 6.0-7.6 for Freshwater Kit.  Kits were made by Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Dissolved Oxygen

                    Directions were followed from the Operations Manual for the YSI- 85 probe.

Figure 5:  YSI – 85 probe   August 26, 2005  Site SN2

Biological Survey

Nekton sampling was done according to a protocol approved by Tim Smith (CZM) and adapted according to the circumstances from  A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes (Appendix II).

Four sites, each ten meters in length, along the harbor and river were marked with PVC pipe.  Starting the first seine (RN1) approximately two hours before low tide in the ocean, a bag seine and stop nets were used to capture fish and invertebrates such as crabs and shrimp.  Organisms were sorted by species into buckets, counted, massed in groups, and measured using standard length (SL) in millimeters for fish and carapace length (CL) for crabs.  When more than forty of a species were caught, a sub-sampling protocol was utilized, in which all fish were massed and a random sub-sample of forty were massed.  Only the forty were measured for SL.  The total mass divided by sub-sample mass gave an expansion factor for analytical purposes.  Organisms were identified by using Inland Fishes of Massachusetts and Marine Animals of Southern New England and New York.                       

                    Figure 6:  Nekton Seining at Site SN2  August 26, 2005           

 

 

Plant survey 

    Using the CZM protocol from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes, a baseline was chosen, and nine randomly selected transects were marked and measured on the harbor salt marsh.  Transects were not installed on the river side yet.  Wells for porewater salinity were installed at two depths (20 cm. and 50 cm.) at the edge of the marsh and the upland border (18 wells).  Porewater salinity was measured by extracting water with a sipper (hollow metal tube attached to a syringe) and using a refractometer.

 

Results

           

During the summer of 2005, the water level ranged from -1.8 (high) to -2.5 (low) and for the year ranged from 0 (high) to -3.45 (low).  The average water level for the year was -2.2 feet NAVD.  After large rainstorms, the water level rose.  (Table 1)

Table 1

 

 

 

 

 

Date

Water level River (ft)

Time

Green Harbor River by dike 2005

3/3/2005

-3.2

15:00

 

 

 

3/30/2005

-3.45

15:45

 

 

 

4/10/2005

-2.5

18:20

 

 

 

4/15/2005

-2.5

15:30

 

 

 

4/22/2005

-2.5

14:00

 

 

 

5/6/2005

-3

12:30

 

 

 

5/15/2005

-2.5

15:30

 

 

 

5/22/2005

-2.2

13:10

0.35” rain

 

 

5/26/2005

-1.4

14:10

1.7” rain in last 3 days

 

 

 5/30/2005

-2.4

17:15

 

 

 

6/4/2005

-2.5

18:30

 

 

 

6/10/2005

-2.1

8:30

 

 

 

6/13/2005

-1.5

20:15

 

 

 

6/26/2005

-2

18:00

 

 

 

6/30/2005

-2.1

10:07

 

 

 

7/2/2005

-2.15

18:20

 

 

 

7/9/2005

-1.8

14:50

1.12” rain 7/7 

0.83” 7/9

 

 

7/16/2005

-1.9

20:20

 

 

 

7/22/2005

-2.5

13:30

 

 

 

7/24/2005

-2.3

16:00

 

 

 

7/29/2005

-2.1

9:43

 

 

 

7/30/2005

-2.1

19:00

 

 

 

7/31/2005

-2.5

9:36

 

 

 

8/5/2005

-2.6

7:45

 

 

 

8/10/2005

-2

19:25

 

 

 

8/12/2005

-2.5

10:30

 

 

 

8/15/2005

-2

10:30

1” rain fell today     

-2.5

13:15

 

8/18/2005

-2.2

15:35

 

 

 

8/24/2005

-2.3

18:15

 

 

 

8/25/2005

-2.5

14:40

 

 

 

8/26/2005

-2.5

8:05

-2.8

13:50

-2.4

9/9/2005

-2.2

18:55

 

 

 

9/14/2005

-2.2

18:35

 

 

 

9/16/2005

-2.7

18:00

3.44” rain fell today

 

 

9/21/2005

-2.3

18:50

 

 

 

9/25/2005

-2.3

11:20

 

 

 

10/23/2005

-1.3

16:40

1.6” rain 10/22 & 10/23

 

 

10/25/2005

0

18:45

0.86” rain

 

10/26/2005

-1

18:45

1.28” rain

 

 

11/14/2005

-2.2

13:45

 

 

 

 

Average -2.2 ft NAVD

 

 

 

               

 

 

            The turbidity, as determined by secchi depth, ranged from 1.5 meters to 2.25 meters in the harbor compared to 0.45 to 2 in the river.  Averages were 1.77 (harbor) and 1.23 (river).  After the gates were all closed on September 2, 2004, the river became more turbid.  On April 22 and June 10, 2005, the water appeared brown with some scum (Figure 3).  The turbidity gradually improved in the river once one tide gate was partially opened in early June.  The clarity increased during the summer with occasional decreases after large rain events. (Figure 7).  Both river and harbor were less turbid in August 2005.  The harbor water was clearer than the river.

           

Table 2

Turbidity

Measurements

2005

 

Date

Harbor Secchi (m)

River Secchi (m)

Harbor T. Tube (cm)

River T. Tube (cm)

4/22

1.125

0.5

 

39

6/10

 

0.45

 

41

6/30

1.5

1.1

 

60

7/9

1.5

0.9

85

45

7/22

1.5

 

71

82.5

7/29

>2.25

>1.75

>110

>110

8/5

 

 

94

74

8/12

 

 

>110

>110

8/15

2.25

2

 

 

8/26

>2.25

1.9

>110

>110

*

Secchi readings not always possible

 

 

 

            The turbidity tube reading ranged from 71- 110+ in the harbor (range of 39) and from 39-110+ (range of 71) in the river (Figure 8).  Mean measurements were:  96.7 cm for the harbor and 74.6 cm for the river.

 

 

The surface salinity in Green Harbor varied from 27 parts per thousand (ppt) to 30.3 (range = 3.3) while the river readings went from 6 to 30 (range = 24).  Means were 29.2 and 22.9 for harbor and river, respectively (Table 3) 

 

Table 3         Physical Data 2005: Green Harbor and Green Harbor River

*  more data is available for seining days 7/29. 8/15, 8/26 for stations RN2 and SN2

 

Date

Station

Time

Salinity (ppt)

Temp °C

DO (mg/l)

DO

%sat.

pH

Secchi (m).

Turbidity tube (cm)

4/22

Harbor

14:15

 

14.4

 

 

8

1.125

 

4/22

River

14:00

6

16.7

 

 

7.2

0.5

39

6/10

River

11:00

14

24

 

 

7.5

0.45

41

6/30

SN1

10:00

23

21

 

 

7.9

1.1

60

6/30

RN1

10:30

28

19

 

 

7.9

1.5

 

7/9

SN1

15:15

17

20

 

 

7.6

0.9

45

7/9

RN1

14:50

27

18

 

 

8

1.5

85

7/22

SN1

14:00

28

26

 

 

8.1

 

82.5

7/22

RN1

13:30

28.5

25

 

 

8.1

1.5

71

7/29

SN1

13:00

28.5

23.5

5.4

79

 

>1.75

>110

7/29

Harbor

9:30

29.5

23.5

 

 

 

>2.25

>110

7/29

RN1

10:45

30.2

23.7

7.3

95.5

 

 

 

8/5

SN1

7:45

27

22

7.88 @11:00

 

8.1

 

74

8/5

RN1

7:55

28.5

26

 

 

8.1

 

94

8/12

SN1

10:30

30

22

 

 

8.0

 

>110

8/12

RN1

10:45

31

21

 

 

8.1

 

>110

8/15

SN1

10:30

27.1

21.1

6.79

84.1

 

2

 

8/15

RN1

10:45

30

 

 

 

 

2.25

 

8/15

RN2

11:50

29.1

19.2

10.49

120.5

 

 

 

8/26

SN1

8:05

 

20

 

 

8.1

1.9

>110

8/26

SN1

10:40

28.1

21.1

6.2

82

 

 

 

8/26

RN1

9:20

30.3

20

6.42

77.1

8.1

>2.25

>110

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:  Secchi readings not able to be taken on days with substantial incoming or outgoing tides.  Secchi reading were taken from road level.

Assigned stations for seining are RN1:  North side of dike in harbor, RN2  further east between two islands in harbor, SN1 North of dike on river side, SN2 South side of river west near Conservation Land path.  6/10 readings are from the W end of the island in the river where a seine was done.  Refer to Figure 2.

 

            Surface water temperatures from April through late August ranged from 14.4 °C to 26 °C in the harbor and 16.7 °C to 26 °C in the river.  The mean was calculated only for the summer data, when collection was regular.  Mean summer temperatures in the harbor and river were 21.7 °C and 22 °C, respectively.  (Figure 10)  The river had a tendency to have slightly higher water temperatures at the surface than the harbor.

 

Dissolved oxygen varied from 6.42 to 10.49 mg/l in the harbor, while in the river the range was from 5.4 to 7.88 mg/l. (Figure 11)  The percent saturation of dissolved oxygen showed considerable differences in the harbor sites RN1 and RN2 from 77.1 to120.5% DO, respectively.  In the river, the range was less (79-84.1%)  (Figure 12)

 

 

 

 

In the harbor, pH was fairly consistent with readings between 7.9 and 8.1.  The river was more variable with measurements ranging from 7.2-8.1 (Figure 13)

 

 

Biological survey

Nekton sampling results

 

List of species caught                                                                             Location

Fish                                                                                         Harbor(H) & River (R)

           

            Mummichogs                                         Fundulus heteroclitus            H R

            Three spine stickleback                          Gasterosteus aculeatus           H

            Fourspine stickleback                            Apeltes quadrucus                       R

            Inland Silverside                                    Menidia beryllina                       R

            Atlantic Silverside                                 Menidia menidia                     H R     

*Banded killifish                                      Fundulus diaphanous                   R

            Winter Flounder (juveniles)                   Pleuronectes americanus          H R

            American eels (juveniles)                        Anguilla rostrata                        R

            Northern Pipefish                                  Syngnathus fuscus                        R

            * Menhaden                                         Brevoortia tyrannus                   H

            White Perch                                         Morone americanus                      R

            Banded killifish                                    Fundulus diaphanus                      R

            *Unknown fish                                                                                    H

            *Unknown fish (sculpin)                                                                       H

            *Unknown fish                                                                                         R

 

Crustacea

            Green crabs                                          Carcinus maenas                        H R

            Grass shrimp                                         Palaemonetes sp.                        H R

            Sand shrimp (Sevenspine bay)              Crangon septemspinosa                 H R

                       

Number of species caught in harbor: 10              Number of species caught in river: 14

*Not positively identified by an expert at this time

 

Table 4

Nekton

2005

 

 

 

 

 

Date

Site #

Species

Quantity

Mass (g)

Ave. mass

Standard length (mm)

Average length

SL  mm

7/29

RN1

Atlantic silversides

53

17

0.3

2146*

25.3

 

 

Mummichog

1

 

 

16

16

 

 

Green crab

4

 

 

76

19

 

 

Grass shrimp

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sand shrimp

4

 

 

 

 

 

RN2

Mummichog

180

36

0.2

3650

20.3

 

 

Silverside

110

47

0.4

3941

35.7

 

 

3 spine stickleback

1

 

 

21

 

 

 

Grass shrimp

1

 

 

17

17

 

 

Green crab

10

13

1.3

137

13.7

 

SN1

Green crab

3

26

8.7

86

28.7

 

 

Grass shrimp

3

 

 

81

27

 

 

Mummichog

2

 

 

49

24.5

 

 

Eel

1

 

 

 

 

 

SN2

Mummichog

365

73

0.2

8724

24.1

 

 

Silverside

118

47

0.4

4319

36.6

 

 

Green crab

8

45

5.6

221

27.6

 

 

Sand shrimp

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fundulus sp.

6

10

1.7

301

50.2

 

 

White perch

2

1

0.5

70

35

 

 

4 spine stickleback

1

 

 

18

18

8/15

RN1

Silverside

140

54

0.4

4846

34.5

 

 

Flounder

21

31

1.5

884

42

 

 

Green crab

7

14

2

116

16.6

 

 

Mummichog

3

< 1

0.3

63

21

 

RN2

Mummichog

700

339

0.5

16,809

29.8

 

 

Silverside

263

92

0.35

8213

31.3

 

 

Flounder

11

14

1.3

418

38

 

 

Herring sp.

10

3

0.3

311

31

 

 

Green crab

4

20

5

108

27

 

 

Unknown fish

2

 

 

51

25.5

 

SN1

Green crab

13

160

12.3

319

24.5

 

 

Mummichog

12

4

0.3

308

25.7

 

 

Silversides

2

 

 

54

27

 

 

Flounder

2

2

1

76

38

 

 

Unknown fish

1

 

 

23

23

 

 

Sand shrimp

1

 

 

 

 

 

SN2

Green crab

7

20

2.9

177

25.3

 

 

Pipefish

3

 

 

180

60

 

 

White perch

1

 

 

33

33

 

 

Sand shrimp

12

4

0.3

 

 

 

 

4 spine stickleback

13

5

0.4

297

22.8

 

 

Silverside

14

17

1.2

696

49.7

 

 

Mummichog

106

57

0.5

2031*

19.2*

8/26

RN1

Mummichog

128

61

0.5

3188

24.9

 

 

Green crab

25

42

1.7

417

16.7

 

 

Silverside

18

5

0.3

578

32.1

 

 

Flounder

17

28

1.6

705

41.5

 

RN2

Green crab

3

 

 

24

8

 

 

Mummichog

37

12

0.3

823

22.2

 

SN1

Flounder

1

24

24

115

115

 

 

Silversides

1

5

5

64

64

 

 

Green crab

7

36

5.1

157

22.4

 

SN2

Pipefish

1

 

 

115

115

 

 

Banded killifish

19

10

0.5

614

32.3

 

 

4 spine stickleback

28

8

0.3

544

19.4

 

 

Green crab

11

11

1

163

14.8

 

 

Mummichog

113

173

1.5

4527

40

 

RN1

Totals

430

253

 

 

 

 

RN2

Totals

1332

376

 

 

 

 

SN1

Totals

49

257

 

 

 

 

SN2

Totals

835

481

 

 

 

*  Sub-samples may not have been representative of entire sample.  Expansions do not fit well with averages.

Additional fish data can be found in the Data sheets for June 10, 2005 but since the spring scales used that day were not highly accurate and the seining was in different locations, the information was not presented here.

 

Table 5

 

 Physical Data for Nekton Sampling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

Date

Station

Time

Salinity

Temp

DO mg/L

DO%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

7/29

RN1

10:45

30.2

23.7

7.3

95.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

7/29

RN2

11:15

29.6

24

10.9

149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

7/29

SN1

13:00

28.5

23.5

5.4

79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

7/29

SN2

13:30

28.8

26.8

8.23

118.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

8/15

RN1

11:15

YSI wasn't ready

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

8/15

RN2

11:50

30

19.2

10.49

120.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

8/15

SN1

13:15

27.1

21.1

6.79

84.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

8/15

SN2

15:00

28.2

21.3

6.96

86.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

Date

Station

Time

Salinity

Temp

DO mg/L

DO%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

08/26

RN1

09:20

30.3

20

6.42

77.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

08/26

RN2

10:30

30.2

23.6

9.20

123

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

08/26

SN1

10:40

28.1

21.1

6.2

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2005

08/26

SN2

12:25

28.1

23.8

5.83

86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 6  Relative Abundance

Reference Site

Study Site

2005

# of organisms captured

# of organisms captured

Site 1

430

49

Site 2

1332

835

Total

1762

884

Relative Abundance

881

442

 

                                                Table 7  Catch Per Unit Effort

Table 7

Bag Seine CPUE

# organisms per

10 meter haul

 

7/29/05

Reference site

 

Study site

 

Station

Fish

Crabs

Fish

Crabs

1

54

4

3

3

2

291

10

492

8

Total

345

14

495

11

Average

173

7

248

6

 

 

 

 

 

8/15/05

Reference site

 

Study site

 

1

164

7

17

13

2

986

4

137

7

Total

1150

11

154

20

Average

575

6

77

10

 

 

 

 

 

8/26/05

Reference site

 

Study site

 

1

163

25

2

7

2

37

3

161

11

Total

200

28

163

18

Average

100

14

82

9

 

 

 

 

 

Summer total

1695

53

812

49

 

 

                                        Table 8 Life Stage:  Nekton Length

Table 8

Life Stage:

Nekton Length

 

 

 

 

Date

Average length (mm)

 

Range (mm)

 

 

 

Reference

Study

Reference

Study

Mummichog (SL)

7/29/05

20

24

12-30

18-50

Mummichog

8/15/05

24

20

14-42

18-60

Mummichog

8/26/05

24

40

12-40

25-67

Silverside

7/29/05

32

37

20-49

24-43

Silverside

8/15/05

32

47

22-61

26-57

Silverside

8/26/05

32

64

24-39

64

Winter Flounder

7/29/05

-

-

-

-

Winter Flounder

8/15/05

41

38

29-60

34-42

Winter Flounder

8/26/05

42

115

33-56