GREEN HARBOR RIVER STUDY
MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS
2005
Laurie Bianchi, M.Ed
Whitman-Hanson Regional High
600 Franklin Street
Whitman, MA 02382
August 3, 2006
3rd draft
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
27 24 |
|
|
Appendix I |
|
|
Appendix II |
|
|
Appendix III |
|
|
Appendix IV |
|
|
Appendix V |
|
|
Appendix VI |
|
|
Appendix VII Appendix VIII Appendix IX
|
Line transect map and plant survey spreadsheet |
Maps and Figures
1 Drainage Basin
2 Site Map of the Green Harbor River
3 Water level marks
4 Turbidity tube
5 Photograph of YSI -85 in use
6 Nekton Seining at Site SN2 August 26, 2005
7 Turbidity Measurements 2005 - Secchi disk
8 Turbidity Tube Measurements
9 Surface Salinity 2005
10 Surface Water Temperatures 2005
11 Dissolved Oxygen Content 2005
12 Comparison of Percent Saturation Dissolved Oxygen 2005
13 pH 2005
14 To be entered - photo of fish
15 Sluice Boards
16 2004 Turbidity Measurements
17 High Turbidity after nine months of zero tidal induction
18 2004 Salinity Profile
19 Postcard of Everson’s Island circa 1920
Tables
1 Water Levels in the Green Harbor River
2 Turbidity Table
3 Physical Data
4 Nekton Sampling Data
5 Physical Data for Nekton Sampling
6 Relative Abundance
7 Bag Seine Catch per unit Effort (CPUE)
8 Life Stages – Nekton Length
Appendices
I Data Sheets arranged by date: General and Nekton
II. Fishes and Crabs - excerpt from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes
III. Salinity – excerpt from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes
IV Rainfall data 2005
V. Nekton Sampling Spreadsheet and Physical Data
VI. Fish of the Estuary
VII. Line transect map
VIII. Summary of Massachusetts Water Quality Standards
IX. Ecological Role of Estuaries
Introduction
This report is the third in a series on the Green Harbor River in Marshfield, Massachusetts. Please refer to the 2003 and 2004 investigations for historical background and literature review. The town of Marshfield, in conjunction with Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management (CZM), is conducting a feasibility study on salt marsh restoration in Green Harbor River. (Figure 1)
After the last tide- gate experiment in August and September 2004, in which a tide- gate was chained open for two weeks, the river was closed off to all tide, and the sluice boards were lowered. Only outflow occurred during the winter of 2004-2005. The river was low and extremely turbid. In early June 2005, the town of Marshfield partially opened one tide gate to allow limited tidal induction. It remains open to this day. Over the summer, water quality improved considerably.
Research was conducted in 2005 to determine the water quality of the river at four sites, two in the harbor and two in the river (Figure 2). An attempt to quantify the biological data began. The purpose of this report is to provide information that can be compared to previous and future data by state and local organizations, municipalities, and individuals, in an effort to bring the river in compliance with the Clean Water Act.
Joining the study this year was the Center for Student Coastal Research in Cohasset. Nekton sampling and water quality testing were done in the harbor and river by David Ames, a number of high school students, and the author.
The hypothesis was that the harbor would have better water quality and habitat than the river because of the tidal restriction at the dike. Very limited tidal exchange has occurred in the river with the current type of tide-gate. With less tidal influence in the river, the dissolved oxygen levels were expected to be lower than in the harbor. Also, the turbidity would be worse in the river. One would expect habitat degradation in the river from years of limited tidal induction, resulting in less diversity of species and smaller populations.
This investigation involved visits ranging from thirty minutes to five hours, approximately once per week, from June 30 to August 26, 2005 at sites along the Green Harbor and Green Harbor River (Figure 2). The harbor is considered the reference site (control) and the river is the study site. There were preliminary visits on April 22 and June 10, with Whitman-Hanson students on a Community Service Learning field trip. Water quality was tested by taking hydrographic measurements such as temperature, specific gravity, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, and turbidity. Not all tests were done each day as time constraints were larger this year due to the quantification and expansion of data collection. Biological (nekton) sampling was done on July 29, August 15 and August 26 according to CZM protocol (Appendix II). Transects were set in the salt marsh of Green Harbor, and wells were placed to measure porewater salinity. (Appendix III)
The drainage area map (Figure 1) is from a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Report (1993).
![]()
![]()
![]()
Figure
2 Site
Map
of Nekton Sampling Sites
![]()
![]()
Rainfall data was provided from Kevin Silva at the Town of Marshfield Wastewater Treatment Facility, located on Joseph Driebeck Way abutting Green Harbor (Appendix IV).
This investigation was completed during three-hour visits, once a week, from June 23 to August 26, 2004 at sites along the Green Harbor River (Figure 1). One preliminary visit with students on a Community Service Learning field trip occurred on May 25. Three follow-up visits were September 6, October 9, and November 14. Water quality was tested on each visit. Hydrographic measurements consisted of temperature, specific gravity, salinity, pH, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and general observations such as color and suspended solids. Plankton tows and bottom sampling were done most days. Biological surveying was accomplished on certain visits, usually when students and/or adults were available to assist with nets.
There was a board attached to the cement of the dike walls on the river. It was marked with elevations above and below mean sea level in feet (NAVD). The board was dislodged by an algal mat in June 2004. Paint marks on the wing walls have since been used to monitor the level. Photographs of the board and cement lines were used to locate the +2 feet mark. A yardstick, cardboard, and spray paint were used to place marks every half-foot down to -3 feet. Volunteers were trained to read the water levels. A reading consisted of date, time, level, tidal action (if any), and any other observations deemed relevant.

Figure 3: Water level in NAVD (mean ocean tide is 0)
June 10, 2005
Turbidity
A secchi disk was clipped onto a line with markings every quarter meter. The disk was lowered over the side of the dike from road level until it disappeared from sight. Then it was lifted slowly until just visible. This process shows the depth to which light can penetrate and is an indicator of the turbidity of the water. The secchi disk was used when the inflow or outflow of water was very slow, preferably around slack tide. When the current was too fast, the disk was pulled laterally, not allowing an accurate reading.
A turbidity tube (GLOBE protocol transparency tube) was used to enhance the quality of turbidity data and to allow measurements even when the current was strong. A clear 120 cm. plastic PVC tube was equipped with a small secchi disk at the bottom. Water collected from a clean bucket or the water collection device was placed in a bucket. With the person’s back to the sun and using a clean container, the water sample was slowly transferred into the turbidity tube, a small amount at a time, just until the secchi disk was not visible. The collector waited for air bubbles to settle as each new amount of water was added. The tube was rotated slowly while viewing to make sure none of the pattern was visible. The height of water in centimeters was recorded.

Figure 4: Turbidity Tube for measuring turbidity
Water Chemistry
The collection bottle or water collection device was first rinsed with the river water. The water sample was collected. A plastic 100 mL graduated cylinder was rinsed with a small amount of sample. After being emptied, the cylinder was filled with 90 mL of the sample. The hydrometer was gently placed in the graduated cylinder. Temperature was checked and recorded. The water was allowed to warm up to 70°F if below that temperature, and the reading was taken from the bottom of the meniscus. The hydrometer was manufactured by Marine Enterprises International, Inc. in Baltimore, MD.
The salinity was determined by using the specific gravity data and a conversion chart. A Sea Test Full Range Specific Gravity Meter manufactured by Aquarium Systems was used to verify the data. The procedure consisted of three steps: (1) Pour the sample to horizontal line, (2) tap the sides to release any air bubbles, and (3) read the salinity in parts per thousand from the pointer. A YSI – 85 probe was used when available. A refractometer was also used several times for equipment comparisons.
Two methods were used for taking the temperature, depending upon the circumstances. For grab samples the method was to collect the sample in the water collection device, transfer the sample to a white bucket, and insert an alcohol thermometer into the bucket for one minute. A YSI – 85 probe was used when available.
The testing container was rinsed with sample water and emptied. The container was filled with sample water up to the line. Four drops of indicator were added for the Freshwater High Range pH Test Kit, three drops for the Freshwater pH Test Kit. The cap was replaced and tipped gently several times to mix. Color was compared to the color chart. The test kit for salt -water and/or fresh water aquaria was chosen depending upon results of the specific gravity test. Ranges were 7.2-8.8 for High Range and 6.0-7.6 for Freshwater Kit. Kits were made by Aquarium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Directions were followed from the Operations Manual for the YSI- 85 probe.
Figure 5: YSI – 85 probe August 26, 2005 Site SN2
Nekton sampling was done according to a protocol approved by Tim Smith (CZM) and adapted according to the circumstances from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes (Appendix II).
Four sites, each ten meters in length, along the harbor and river were marked with PVC pipe. Starting the first seine (RN1) approximately two hours before low tide in the ocean, a bag seine and stop nets were used to capture fish and invertebrates such as crabs and shrimp. Organisms were sorted by species into buckets, counted, massed in groups, and measured using standard length (SL) in millimeters for fish and carapace length (CL) for crabs. When more than forty of a species were caught, a sub-sampling protocol was utilized, in which all fish were massed and a random sub-sample of forty were massed. Only the forty were measured for SL. The total mass divided by sub-sample mass gave an expansion factor for analytical purposes. Organisms were identified by using Inland Fishes of Massachusetts and Marine Animals of Southern New England and New York.
Figure
6: Nekton Seining at Site SN2 August 26, 2005 
Plant survey
Using the CZM protocol from A Volunteer’s Handbook for Monitoring New England Salt Marshes, a baseline was chosen, and nine randomly selected transects were marked and measured on the harbor salt marsh. Transects were not installed on the river side yet. Wells for porewater salinity were installed at two depths (20 cm. and 50 cm.) at the edge of the marsh and the upland border (18 wells). Porewater salinity was measured by extracting water with a sipper (hollow metal tube attached to a syringe) and using a refractometer.
esults
During the summer of 2005, the water level ranged from -1.8 (high) to -2.5 (low) and for the year ranged from 0 (high) to -3.45 (low). The average water level for the year was -2.2 feet NAVD. After large rainstorms, the water level rose. (Table 1)
|
Table 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Date |
Water level River (ft) |
Time |
Green Harbor River by dike 2005 |
||||
|
3/3/2005 |
-3.2 |
15:00 |
|
|
|
||
|
3/30/2005 |
-3.45 |
15:45 |
|
|
|
||
|
4/10/2005 |
-2.5 |
18:20 |
|
|
|
||
|
4/15/2005 |
-2.5 |
15:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
4/22/2005 |
-2.5 |
14:00 |
|
|
|
||
|
5/6/2005 |
-3 |
12:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
5/15/2005 |
-2.5 |
15:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
5/22/2005 |
-2.2 |
13:10 |
0.35” rain |
|
|
||
|
5/26/2005 |
-1.4 |
14:10 |
1.7” rain in last 3 days |
|
|
||
|
5/30/2005 |
-2.4 |
17:15 |
|
|
|
||
|
6/4/2005 |
-2.5 |
18:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
6/10/2005 |
-2.1 |
8:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
6/13/2005 |
-1.5 |
20:15 |
|
|
|
||
|
6/26/2005 |
-2 |
18:00 |
|
|
|
||
|
6/30/2005 |
-2.1 |
10:07 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/2/2005 |
-2.15 |
18:20 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/9/2005 |
-1.8 |
14:50 |
1.12” rain 7/7 0.83” 7/9 |
|
|
||
|
7/16/2005 |
-1.9 |
20:20 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/22/2005 |
-2.5 |
13:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/24/2005 |
-2.3 |
16:00 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/29/2005 |
-2.1 |
9:43 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/30/2005 |
-2.1 |
19:00 |
|
|
|
||
|
7/31/2005 |
-2.5 |
9:36 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/5/2005 |
-2.6 |
7:45 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/10/2005 |
-2 |
19:25 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/12/2005 |
-2.5 |
10:30 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/15/2005 |
-2 |
10:30 |
1” rain fell today -2.5 |
13:15 |
|
||
|
8/18/2005 |
-2.2 |
15:35 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/24/2005 |
-2.3 |
18:15 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/25/2005 |
-2.5 |
14:40 |
|
|
|
||
|
8/26/2005 |
-2.5 |
8:05 |
-2.8 |
13:50 |
-2.4 |
||
|
9/9/2005 |
-2.2 |
18:55 |
|
|
|
||
|
9/14/2005 |
-2.2 |
18:35 |
|
|
|
||
|
9/16/2005 |
-2.7 |
18:00 |
3.44” rain fell today |
|
|
||
|
9/21/2005 |
-2.3 |
18:50 |
|
|
|
||
|
9/25/2005 |
-2.3 |
11:20 |
|
|
|
||
|
10/23/2005 |
-1.3 |
16:40 |
1.6” rain 10/22 & 10/23 |
|
|
||
|
10/25/2005 |
0 |
18:45 |
0.86” rain |
|
|||
|
10/26/2005 |
-1 |
18:45 |
1.28” rain |
|
|
||
|
11/14/2005 |
-2.2 |
13:45 |
|
|
|
||
|
|
Average -2.2 ft NAVD |
|
|
|
|||
The turbidity, as determined by secchi depth, ranged from 1.5 meters to 2.25 meters in the harbor compared to 0.45 to 2 in the river. Averages were 1.77 (harbor) and 1.23 (river). After the gates were all closed on September 2, 2004, the river became more turbid. On April 22 and June 10, 2005, the water appeared brown with some scum (Figure 3). The turbidity gradually improved in the river once one tide gate was partially opened in early June. The clarity increased during the summer with occasional decreases after large rain events. (Figure 7). Both river and harbor were less turbid in August 2005. The harbor water was clearer than the river.

|
Table 2 |
Turbidity |
Measurements |
2005 |
|
|
Date |
Harbor Secchi (m) |
River Secchi (m) |
Harbor T. Tube (cm) |
River T. Tube (cm) |
|
4/22 |
1.125 |
0.5 |
|
39 |
|
6/10 |
|
0.45 |
|
41 |
|
6/30 |
1.5 |
1.1 |
|
60 |
|
7/9 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
85 |
45 |
|
7/22 |
1.5 |
|
71 |
82.5 |
|
7/29 |
>2.25 |
>1.75 |
>110 |
>110 |
|
8/5 |
|
|
94 |
74 |
|
8/12 |
|
|
>110 |
>110 |
|
8/15 |
2.25 |
2 |
|
|
|
8/26 |
>2.25 |
1.9 |
>110 |
>110 |
|
* |
Secchi readings not always possible |
|
|
|
The turbidity tube reading ranged from 71- 110+ in the harbor (range of 39) and from 39-110+ (range of 71) in the river (Figure 8). Mean measurements were: 96.7 cm for the harbor and 74.6 cm for the river.

The surface salinity in Green Harbor varied from 27 parts per thousand (ppt) to 30.3 (range = 3.3) while the river readings went from 6 to 30 (range = 24). Means were 29.2 and 22.9 for harbor and river, respectively (Table 3)
Table 3 Physical Data 2005: Green Harbor and Green Harbor River
* more data is available for seining days 7/29. 8/15, 8/26 for stations RN2 and SN2
|
Date |
Station |
Time |
Salinity (ppt) |
Temp °C |
DO (mg/l) |
DO %sat. |
pH |
Secchi (m). |
Turbidity tube (cm) |
|
4/22 |
Harbor |
14:15 |
|
14.4 |
|
|
8 |
1.125 |
|
|
4/22 |
River |
14:00 |
6 |
16.7 |
|
|
7.2 |
0.5 |
39 |
|
6/10 |
River |
11:00 |
14 |
24 |
|
|
7.5 |
0.45 |
41 |
|
6/30 |
SN1 |
10:00 |
23 |
21 |
|
|
7.9 |
1.1 |
60 |
|
6/30 |
RN1 |
10:30 |
28 |
19 |
|
|
7.9 |
1.5 |
|
|
7/9 |
SN1 |
15:15 |
17 |
20 |
|
|
7.6 |
0.9 |
45 |
|
7/9 |
RN1 |
14:50 |
27 |
18 |
|
|
8 |
1.5 |
85 |
|
7/22 |
SN1 |
14:00 |
28 |
26 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
82.5 |
|
7/22 |
RN1 |
13:30 |
28.5 |
25 |
|
|
8.1 |
1.5 |
71 |
|
7/29 |
SN1 |
13:00 |
28.5 |
23.5 |
5.4 |
79 |
|
>1.75 |
>110 |
|
7/29 |
Harbor |
9:30 |
29.5 |
23.5 |
|
|
|
>2.25 |
>110 |
|
7/29 |
RN1 |
10:45 |
30.2 |
23.7 |
7.3 |
95.5 |
|
|
|
|
8/5 |
SN1 |
7:45 |
27 |
22 |
7.88 @11:00 |
|
8.1 |
|
74 |
|
8/5 |
RN1 |
7:55 |
28.5 |
26 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
94 |
|
8/12 |
SN1 |
10:30 |
30 |
22 |
|
|
8.0 |
|
>110 |
|
8/12 |
RN1 |
10:45 |
31 |
21 |
|
|
8.1 |
|
>110 |
|
8/15 |
SN1 |
10:30 |
27.1 |
21.1 |
6.79 |
84.1 |
|
2 |
|
|
8/15 |
RN1 |
10:45 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
8/15 |
RN2 |
11:50 |
29.1 |
19.2 |
10.49 |
120.5 |
|
|
|
|
8/26 |
SN1 |
8:05 |
|
20 |
|
|
8.1 |
1.9 |
>110 |
|
8/26 |
SN1 |
10:40 |
28.1 |
21.1 |
6.2 |
82 |
|
|
|
|
8/26 |
RN1 |
9:20 |
30.3 |
20 |
6.42 |
77.1 |
8.1 |
>2.25 |
>110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Secchi readings not able to be taken on days with substantial incoming or outgoing tides. Secchi reading were taken from road level.
Assigned stations for seining are RN1: North side of dike in harbor, RN2 further east between two islands in harbor, SN1 North of dike on river side, SN2 South side of river west near Conservation Land path. 6/10 readings are from the W end of the island in the river where a seine was done. Refer to Figure 2.

Surface water temperatures from April through late August ranged from 14.4 °C to 26 °C in the harbor and 16.7 °C to 26 °C in the river. The mean was calculated only for the summer data, when collection was regular. Mean summer temperatures in the harbor and river were 21.7 °C and 22 °C, respectively. (Figure 10) The river had a tendency to have slightly higher water temperatures at the surface than the harbor.

Dissolved oxygen varied from 6.42 to 10.49 mg/l in the harbor, while in the river the range was from 5.4 to 7.88 mg/l. (Figure 11) The percent saturation of dissolved oxygen showed considerable differences in the harbor sites RN1 and RN2 from 77.1 to120.5% DO, respectively. In the river, the range was less (79-84.1%) (Figure 12)


In the harbor, pH was fairly consistent with readings between 7.9 and 8.1. The river was more variable with measurements ranging from 7.2-8.1 (Figure 13)

Nekton sampling results
List of species caught Location
Fish Harbor(H) & River (R)
Mummichogs Fundulus heteroclitus H R
Three spine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus H
Fourspine stickleback Apeltes quadrucus R
Inland Silverside Menidia beryllina R
Atlantic Silverside Menidia menidia H R
*Banded killifish Fundulus diaphanous R
Winter Flounder (juveniles) Pleuronectes americanus H R
American eels (juveniles) Anguilla rostrata R
Northern Pipefish Syngnathus fuscus R
* Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus H
White Perch Morone americanus R
Banded killifish Fundulus diaphanus R
*Unknown fish H
*Unknown fish (sculpin) H
*Unknown fish R
Crustacea
Green crabs Carcinus maenas H R
Grass shrimp Palaemonetes sp. H R
Sand shrimp (Sevenspine bay) Crangon septemspinosa H R
Number of species caught in harbor: 10 Number of species caught in river: 14
*Not positively identified by an expert at this time
|
Table 4 |
Nekton |
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Site # |
Species |
Quantity |
Mass (g) |
Ave. mass |
Standard length (mm) |
Average length SL mm |
|
7/29 |
RN1 |
Atlantic silversides |
53 |
17 |
0.3 |
2146* |
25.3 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
1 |
|
|
16 |
16 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
4 |
|
|
76 |
19 |
|
|
|
Grass shrimp |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sand shrimp |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RN2 |
Mummichog |
180 |
36 |
0.2 |
3650 |
20.3 |
|
|
|
Silverside |
110 |
47 |
0.4 |
3941 |
35.7 |
|
|
|
3 spine stickleback |
1 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
Grass shrimp |
1 |
|
|
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
10 |
13 |
1.3 |
137 |
13.7 |
|
|
SN1 |
Green crab |
3 |
26 |
8.7 |
86 |
28.7 |
|
|
|
Grass shrimp |
3 |
|
|
81 |
27 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
2 |
|
|
49 |
24.5 |
|
|
|
Eel |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SN2 |
Mummichog |
365 |
73 |
0.2 |
8724 |
24.1 |
|
|
|
Silverside |
118 |
47 |
0.4 |
4319 |
36.6 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
8 |
45 |
5.6 |
221 |
27.6 |
|
|
|
Sand shrimp |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fundulus sp. |
6 |
10 |
1.7 |
301 |
50.2 |
|
|
|
White perch |
2 |
1 |
0.5 |
70 |
35 |
|
|
|
4 spine stickleback |
1 |
|
|
18 |
18 |
|
8/15 |
RN1 |
Silverside |
140 |
54 |
0.4 |
4846 |
34.5 |
|
|
|
Flounder |
21 |
31 |
1.5 |
884 |
42 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
7 |
14 |
2 |
116 |
16.6 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
3 |
< 1 |
0.3 |
63 |
21 |
|
|
RN2 |
Mummichog |
700 |
339 |
0.5 |
16,809 |
29.8 |
|
|
|
Silverside |
263 |
92 |
0.35 |
8213 |
31.3 |
|
|
|
Flounder |
11 |
14 |
1.3 |
418 |
38 |
|
|
|
Herring sp. |
10 |
3 |
0.3 |
311 |
31 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
4 |
20 |
5 |
108 |
27 |
|
|
|
Unknown fish |
2 |
|
|
51 |
25.5 |
|
|
SN1 |
Green crab |
13 |
160 |
12.3 |
319 |
24.5 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
12 |
4 |
0.3 |
308 |
25.7 |
|
|
|
Silversides |
2 |
|
|
54 |
27 |
|
|
|
Flounder |
2 |
2 |
1 |
76 |
38 |
|
|
|
Unknown fish |
1 |
|
|
23 |
23 |
|
|
|
Sand shrimp |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SN2 |
Green crab |
7 |
20 |
2.9 |
177 |
25.3 |
|
|
|
Pipefish |
3 |
|
|
180 |
60 |
|
|
|
White perch |
1 |
|
|
33 |
33 |
|
|
|
Sand shrimp |
12 |
4 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 spine stickleback |
13 |
5 |
0.4 |
297 |
22.8 |
|
|
|
Silverside |
14 |
17 |
1.2 |
696 |
49.7 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
106 |
57 |
0.5 |
2031* |
19.2* |
|
8/26 |
RN1 |
Mummichog |
128 |
61 |
0.5 |
3188 |
24.9 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
25 |
42 |
1.7 |
417 |
16.7 |
|
|
|
Silverside |
18 |
5 |
0.3 |
578 |
32.1 |
|
|
|
Flounder |
17 |
28 |
1.6 |
705 |
41.5 |
|
|
RN2 |
Green crab |
3 |
|
|
24 |
8 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
37 |
12 |
0.3 |
823 |
22.2 |
|
|
SN1 |
Flounder |
1 |
24 |
24 |
115 |
115 |
|
|
|
Silversides |
1 |
5 |
5 |
64 |
64 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
7 |
36 |
5.1 |
157 |
22.4 |
|
|
SN2 |
Pipefish |
1 |
|
|
115 |
115 |
|
|
|
Banded killifish |
19 |
10 |
0.5 |
614 |
32.3 |
|
|
|
4 spine stickleback |
28 |
8 |
0.3 |
544 |
19.4 |
|
|
|
Green crab |
11 |
11 |
1 |
163 |
14.8 |
|
|
|
Mummichog |
113 |
173 |
1.5 |
4527 |
40 |
|
|
RN1 |
Totals |
430 |
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
RN2 |
Totals |
1332 |
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
SN1 |
Totals |
49 |
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
SN2 |
Totals |
835 |
481 |
|
|
|
* Sub-samples may not have been representative of entire sample. Expansions do not fit well with averages.
Additional fish data can be found in the Data sheets for June 10, 2005 but since the spring scales used that day were not highly accurate and the seining was in different locations, the information was not presented here.
|
Table 5 |
|
Physical Data for Nekton Sampling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Date |
Station |
Time |
Salinity |
Temp |
DO mg/L |
DO% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
7/29 |
RN1 |
10:45 |
30.2 |
23.7 |
7.3 |
95.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
7/29 |
RN2 |
11:15 |
29.6 |
24 |
10.9 |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
7/29 |
SN1 |
13:00 |
28.5 |
23.5 |
5.4 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
7/29 |
SN2 |
13:30 |
28.8 |
26.8 |
8.23 |
118.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
8/15 |
RN1 |
11:15 |
YSI wasn't ready |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
8/15 |
RN2 |
11:50 |
30 |
19.2 |
10.49 |
120.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
8/15 |
SN1 |
13:15 |
27.1 |
21.1 |
6.79 |
84.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
8/15 |
SN2 |
15:00 |
28.2 |
21.3 |
6.96 |
86.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Date |
Station |
Time |
Salinity |
Temp |
DO mg/L |
DO% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
08/26 |
RN1 |
09:20 |
30.3 |
20 |
6.42 |
77.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
08/26 |
RN2 |
10:30 |
30.2 |
23.6 |
9.20 |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
08/26 |
SN1 |
10:40 |
28.1 |
21.1 |
6.2 |
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
08/26 |
SN2 |
12:25 |
28.1 |
23.8 |
5.83 |
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 6 Relative Abundance |
Reference Site |
Study Site |
|
2005 |
# of organisms captured |
# of organisms captured |
|
Site 1 |
430 |
49 |
|
Site 2 |
1332 |
835 |
|
Total |
1762 |
884 |
|
Relative Abundance |
881 |
442 |
Table 7 Catch Per Unit Effort
|
Table 7 |
Bag Seine CPUE |
# organisms per |
10 meter haul |
|
|
7/29/05 |
Reference site |
|
Study site |
|
|
Station |
Fish |
Crabs |
Fish |
Crabs |
|
1 |
54 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
|
2 |
291 |
10 |
492 |
8 |
|
Total |
345 |
14 |
495 |
11 |
|
Average |
173 |
7 |
248 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/15/05 |
Reference site |
|
Study site |
|
|
1 |
164 |
7 |
17 |
13 |
|
2 |
986 |
4 |
137 |
7 |
|
Total |
1150 |
11 |
154 |
20 |
|
Average |
575 |
6 |
77 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8/26/05 |
Reference site |
|
Study site |
|
|
1 |
163 |
25 |
2 |
7 |
|
2 |
37 |
3 |
161 |
11 |
|
Total |
200 |
28 |
163 |
18 |
|
Average |
100 |
14 |
82 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summer total |
1695 |
53 |
812 |
49 |
Table 8 Life Stage: Nekton Length
|
Table 8 |
Life Stage: |
Nekton Length |
|
|
|
|
|
Date |
Average length (mm) |
|
Range (mm) |
|
|
|
|
Reference |
Study |
Reference |
Study |
|
Mummichog (SL) |
7/29/05 |
20 |
24 |
12-30 |
18-50 |
|
Mummichog |
8/15/05 |
24 |
20 |
14-42 |
18-60 |
|
Mummichog |
8/26/05 |
24 |
40 |
12-40 |
25-67 |
|
Silverside |
7/29/05 |
32 |
37 |
20-49 |
24-43 |
|
Silverside |
8/15/05 |
32 |
47 |
22-61 |
26-57 |
|
Silverside |
8/26/05 |
32 |
64 |
24-39 |
64 |
|
Winter Flounder |
7/29/05 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
Winter Flounder |
8/15/05 |
41 |
38 |
29-60 |
34-42 |
|
Winter Flounder |
8/26/05 |
42 |
115 |
33-56 |